My paper seeks to build on Shelton’s argument and demonstrate that capital accumulation can occur within areas of racialized poverty, without residents of these neighborhoods experiencing any tangible benefits. Maps and their legends are paired with quotes from Taylor Shelton’s original study that were formative in the creation of my argument. To view the folio in its entirety, navigate to issuu.com/nickptrn/docs/racializedpoverty
The project began as an attempt to recreate a similar study conducted by Taylor Shelton for the Louisville, Kentucky to see if similar patterns existed in Boston. His paper used critical GIS to challenge traditional characterizations of areas of concentrated poverty, and he sets up standards for the terms racially/ethnically concentrated areas of (relative) poverty, or RECAP/RECArPs, and racially/ethnically concentrated areas of (relative) affluence, or RECAA/RECArAs.
The argument made by this study is similar to that of Taylor Shelton, namely that poverty and affluence cannot be defined by areal units like RECAPs or RECAAs and are created instead through flows of capital. Concentrated poverty is not characterized by the isolation of residents, but rather by the extraction of resident’s limited resources by the affluent.
I recently completed an Advanced Spatial Analysis course for my MS, Urban Informatics program in which I visualized racialized poverty and affluence in the city of Boston and explored the relationship between residential parcel-ownership and affordability. The project was ultimately realized in the form of a physical folio to display the series of maps and argument for policy to cap rent at 30% of 5-year ACS median household income for a given census tract.